Is Starkiller Base bigger than Death Star?

The Star Wars galaxy has witnessed its fair share of terrifying superweapons, but none perhaps more so than the Death Star and its successor, Starkiller Base. Both weapons of ultimate destruction, they dwarf anything previously conceived. But which one reigns supreme in terms of sheer size?

The Answer: Starkiller Base is significantly larger.

• Starkiller Base: This First Order weapon wasn't just a space station; it was an entire ice planet converted into a galactic-scale battering ram. With a diameter of 660 kilometers, Starkiller Base dwarfs both Death Stars.
• Death Star: The original Death Star had a diameter of 160 kilometers, while the second was even larger.

Key Differences:

• Scale of Destruction: While the Death Star could destroy planets, Starkiller Base could obliterate entire star systems with a single shot.
• Construction: The Death Star was a massive artificial construct, while Starkiller Base was built within a planet, utilizing its natural resources and gravity.

In Conclusion:

Starkiller Base represents a leap in both scale and destructive power compared to the Death Star. It stands as a testament to the First Order's ambition and technological prowess, even if its reign of terror was ultimately short-lived.

Disclaimer: This blog post is based on information available in the Star Wars canon, primarily the films Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope, Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi, and Star Wars: The Force Awakens.